Gene Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi all,
> 
> I hope this isn't considered off topic.  I have been running amanda now
> for a month or so and all is going well (thanks to alot of help from
> this list!).
> 
> My tape server is a Sun E250 (Solaris 8) with a single DDS-4 tape
> drive.  I'm backing up approximately 15 clients (mostly solaris 8 /linux
> - RH7.2) with three windows boxes.  The last windows box I added is
> taking me over the limit.  It has 4 large partitions, the largest of
> which can't ever seem to fit on the tape with everything else when it
> does a level 0 dump.
> 
> I don't really want to go the manual changer route since the backups are
> cron'd and nobody is around in the middle of the night to change tapes.
> 
> I'm starting to look at another tape drive solution and leaning towards
> DLT.  I've seen references to AIT-2/AIT-3 also; I'm not sure what that
> is.  I'm not up on my tape technology I guess.
> 
> I'm thinking of a DLT stacker or maybe a low end DLT tape library.  Does
> anyone have any recommendations that they know works well with Amanda? 
> There seems to be plenty of h/w to choose from based upon my web
> searches and looking at vendor sites, but I don't want to purchase
> something that isn't going to work with Amanda.
> 
> I couldn't find any info like this in the FAQ and my search of the
> archives didn't turn up anything either.
> 
> All input very much appreciated!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gene

Gene,

Don't spend money too fast.

So you're saying that the compressed size of your biggest disklist
entry is over 20 GB on a level 0?

In this case you could make different disklist entries for all sub
directories, creating new, (hidden $) shares (just for backup). This
works best if the subdir's are somehow constant and no new sibblings
are created. E. g. if you did backup \\nt\c$ , you could backup
\\nt\c$\winnt , \\nt\c$\programms, etc.


Or are you just getting "out of tape" errors?

Amanda will balance the backup levels for you over time. So after a
few cycles the tape with a level 0 of \\nt (current configuration)
will have (high numbered) incrementals of all other partitions. You
could increase "dumpcycle".

HTH,

Johannes Nieß

Reply via email to