Cripes, there were two entries for amanda in /etc/passwd (with different 
home dirs - and, of course, mine was listed last) - something from a 
forgotten era.

Thanks for your help.

Jenn

John R. Jackson wrote:

>>ERROR: girdwood: [access as amanda not allowed from amanda@server] 
>>
> 
> In addition to what Joshua asked, what is the ownership and mode on
> ~amanda/.amandahosts on this client?  It should be owned by "amanda"
> and mode 0400 or 0600


> 
> You should also make sure "amanda" owns its own home directory and has
> rwx rights through it.


> 
> For instance, does this work:
> 
>   su - amanda -c "cat ~amanda/.amandahosts"
> 
> Also, the message tells you almost exactly what Amanda used during the
> lookup.  The "amanda@server" text says it looked for:
> 
>   server amanda
> 
> And if that's still confusing, take a look at the amandad*debug file.
> If you're running a recent enough version of Amanda, it should say
> something like this:
> 
>   bsd security: remote host clerk.cc.purdue.edu user backup local user backup
>   
> This says the remote host (from the client point of view) was
> "clerk.cc.purdue.edu" and the remote user was "backup".  So the entry
> in the .amandahosts file needs to be:
> 
>   clerk.cc.purdue.edu backup
> 
> The last part ("local user") says amandad is running as "backup" on the
> client, so that's the home directory it's going to look at.
> 
> Finally, I seem to recall some silly syntax restrictions (ummm, errr,
> OK, they were bugs :-) in .amandahosts in the distant past.  Make sure
> you don't have any leading or trailing whitespace in the file.
> 
> 
>>...  Is it possible that 
>>sometimes this authorization mechanism just won't work?  ...
>>
> 
> Unlikely.  The code to use .amandahosts is completely built in to
> Amanda itself.  It's "our" code so we can make it work.
> 
> This is a fairly common startup problem, so don't despair.  It's almost
> always a permissions, ownership or path problem of some type.
> 
> 
>>Jenn
>>
> 
> John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

Reply via email to