On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 10:38, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > Indeed. My reasoning is that as users get confused rather easily > (poor users), it's best (for them, and more importantly, for you) to keep > their data "in the same place" regardless of the underlying hardware. :)
I'm in a different environment altogether. I work for an ISP, so almost all my clients are servers that my customers never see, much less know anything about. There is only one filesystem on one client (the shell server) where users might be exposed to where their data actually lives, but for the most part their data is kept hidden behind proxies and load-balanced clusters, so they are unaware of the individual machines. Eric
