Hi Gene thanks for the reply.
the lo interface is up with the 127.0.0.1 ip. The amandahost files is correct and I am really stuck on what is broken. I have posted a printout of the permissions of my directory incase something in debian linux is not kosher. Also the clients the redhat backup server backup are solaris machines. Also included is a amandad debug file from my /tmp/amanda. I am really at a loss to why one will work and one does not. regards Joseph ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gene Heskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sirucka, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:47 PM Subject: Re: errors still > On Tuesday 10 June 2003 02:56, Joseph Sirucka wrote: > >Hi All > > > >I have recently installed two amanda backup servers. > > > >One is a redhat 8 server with a six stacker dds 3 autoloader, and a > > debian unit with a single dds3 unit. > > > >I compiled amanda on both servers. They both have the same > > permissions and user privilages. > > Can we assume they were unpacked and built by the user 'amanda', who > is a member of group 'disk' or 'backup' or similarly high permissions > rated group, and then installed by the user 'root'? > > >The redhat server seems to be able to back itself and other servers > > up other than the second backup server. > > > >The debian unit does not seem to want to back it self up (it was > > only designed for backing itself up). > > Is the 'lo' interface up? even when backing up itself, amanda uses the > client/server model. > > >In the /tmp/amanda the debug files show no errors and are the same > > amoung the two servers. THe debian server passes the amcheck but > > fails during the amdump. > > > >My error I get from the debian server is > > > >olbs2 /usr lev 0 FAILED [disk /usr offline on olbs2] > > and I assume that 'olbs2' is an alias present and accounted for in the > /etc/hosts, AND the ~/.amandahosts files? > > >and the two errors amongst the redhat box is > > > >planner: ERROR olbgeNAK: amandad busy > >olbgen /export/home RESULT MISSING > > It appears you have that process hung for some reason. The question > is why? perms? > > >I have looked upon the faq-o-matic with help from them > > > >regards > > > >Joseph > > -- > Cheers, Gene > AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED] 320M > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 512M > 99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly > Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message > by Gene Heskett are: > Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. > >
amanda.log
Description: Binary data
amandad.20030611161637.debug
Description: Binary data
