On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:10:54AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > >> instead an internal IDE drive, they went out and got a 250GB >> drive and installed it before I revisited. Until now I've >> never seen a 240GB file system :)) > > Bah: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] jlb]$ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > *snip* > philip:/data 535G 396G 140G 74% /data > fluffy:/moredata 1.8T 1.3T 543G 71% /moredata > buckbeak:/emfd 2.0T 1.2T 822G 60% /emfd
BRAGGART!! :)) > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 at 10:02am, Gene Heskett wrote > > > >Even More F..ing Data ? > > > > Are we allowed to chuckle here? From the nameing convention used, > > that would be the next logical progression. But now I wonder what > > the 4th lashup will be called if and when its needed? I hope you are > > planning ahead. :-) > > The only thing I've come up with is "Enough 'Fine' Data Already", but > that's just reusing the joke of the 3rd name. I'm open to suggestions... > How about MOAFD ? (Mother Of All Fine Data) -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)