Hi, Nicolas, on Donnerstag, 13. Jänner 2005 at 12:17 you wrote to amanda-users:
NE> I guess once you have the xml files, the target formats are not a NE> problem. You just have to write a converter. NE> I play a little with Latex, and it's working the same way. I wasn't clear: We have converters ready for tex pdf ps html htmlman manpages txt Have a look at http://www.amanda.org/docs/AMANDA-docs.html for some of the results. >> And this switch to the xml-docs-tree would make it somewhat easier to >> maintain the docs, which leads to better quality ... NE> So must I understand that this switch isn't done yet ? NE> (From your last posts, I thought this had begun ?) The conversion is done, but the xml-files are not yet used for generating the files for the official AMANDA-releases. This will be done soon and this is what I meant with "switch". >> So to answer your question: No translation-project yet, but I will be >> happy to support you in starting one ;-) NE> For my company, I wrote a quite huge doc in french about the daily use NE> of amanda, and the use of the small tools around, like dd, tar, dump, NE> restore... NE> This took me a long time, but I liked it. NE> I already translated some man pages of mutt into french, and I think I NE> could do the same for amanda. Sure, welcome. NE> I fact, it seems that in France Amanda isn't quite used because of the NE> lack of simple documentation. NE> So instead of re-writing a new doc in french, it could be wiser to NE> translate your xml files into french. NE> Could you tell me the % of files formated in xml ? As Gavin noticed, 100% are available in Docbook/XML. There is a CVS-branch, browse it at: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/amanda/xml-docs/ -- best regards, Stefan Stefan G. Weichinger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]