On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:53 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:01:37PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:50 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > > I Have had a back-up active since 1 o'clock (this night). When I issue > > > amstatus I can see that it is still active although apparently doing > > > nothing. It reports one dumper busy with "no-bandwidth". What ican my > > > problem be and what is this "no-bandwidth"? > > > > I am still puzzled by the "no-bandwidth" report. I do not use network > > backup so I believe I have oodles of bandwidth. Does amanda have a bug > > reporting system that I could search for possible bugs in this area? > > > Every amanda backup is a "network" backup. I.e. client -> host. > That still uses part of the network stack I believe.
OK. > > > > ... > > > 4 dumpers idle : not-idle > > > taper idle > > > network free kps: 2000 > > > holding space : 3313820k (100.00%) > > > dumper0 busy : 2:26:38 ( 88.61%) > > > taper busy : 0:18:07 ( 10.95%) > > > 0 dumpers busy : 0:18:49 ( 11.38%) not-idle: 0:17:45 > > > ( 94.32%) > > > start-wait: 0:01:04 ( > > > 5.68%) > > > 1 dumper busy : 2:26:39 ( 88.62%) no-bandwidth: 2:04:42 > > > ( 85.03%) > > > not-idle: 0:20:01 > > > I'm on shakey ground here. This is not a report of the current state, but > how things went during the run. Seems like you would allow 4 dumpers max. > There were times when it could have gone to a second dumper but was > unable to do so. The it gives the reasons, only one in yours, multiple > in Guy's report in the message that follows your in my mailer. > > What do you have netusage set to? As mentioned in an earlier message, 600 kbps. However, I also have: define interface local { comment "a local disk" use 1000 kbps } I have now cranked up the latter to 3000 kbps, so I'll see tonight how that behaves. > -- Regards, Erik P. Olsen