On Monday 13 February 2006 20:10, chuck.amadi wrote: >Kevin Till wrote: >> Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote: >>> Hi List >>> >>> I had a look on the amanda client less /tmp/amanda >>> >>> less amandad.20060213153537.debug >>> >>> Here is the debug report: >>> ---- >>> Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 003-E0990808 SEQ 1139841004 >>> SECURITY USER amanda >>> SERVICE noop >>> OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f; >>> ---- >>> >>> amandad: time 9.815: it is not an ack >>> amandad: time 9.815: sending REP packet: >>> ---- >>> Amanda 2.4 REP HANDLE 003-E0990808 SEQ 1139841004 >>> ERROR [host fw.my.co.uk: port ***** not secure] >>> ---- >>> >>> amandad: time 18.975: got packet: >>> ---- >>> Amanda 2.4 REQ HANDLE 003-E0990808 SEQ 1139841004 >>> SECURITY USER amanda >>> SERVICE noop >>> OPTIONS features=fffffeff9ffe0f; >>> ---- >>> >>> amandad: time 18.975: it is not an ack >>> amandad: time 18.975: sending REP packet: >>> >>> Thus I assume I need to add rules for the Firewall server: >>> >>> Any examples or notes >> >> Hi Chuck, >> >> there is some info about iptables firewall setup at >> http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Configuration_with_iptables > >Cheers I did google this But I am using ipchains. > >Are there any examples for me to look at.
I'd assume you will need to google for those, Chuck. ipchains isn't exactly jurassic you know, more probably pre-cambrian in computer time. Not many fossils still exist from that era. Any good reason why you don't switch to iptables? -- Cheers, Gene People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word 'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-) Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.