On 3/8/07, Stefan G. Weichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FL schrieb: > Maybe I can add to it -- when I have a break. Yeah ;) I know that definition of a date.
Well, it's more reliable and precise than setting a time subject to last minute confirmation (that translates in practice to "never").
I've just > gone through the same exercise on a CentOS 4 system (I intend to upgrade > it to RHEL 4); on that system it was necessary to run modprobe sg to see > the devices, and the udev syntax (which I believe is the same as Fedora > Core). Perhaps the need to run modprobe is a bug. [...] > Though it is still necessary to run modprobe sg Well, I don't see the problem with this. If sg-support isn't compiled into the kernel, but compiled as a module, that module has to be loaded to be able to access the devices it supports. Do I misunderstand something here? Stefan
There's nothing wrong with having to use modproble... Somehow I had the impression that udev would work with modprobe--my Debian system seemed tol load the sg modules without the modprobe after my udev modification! It could have been a hallucination. Yes, you failed to understand that I was hallucinating (why not blame the victim). I didn't check if SCSI generic devices were part of the kernel--I didn't think they were. I'll check again.
