Hi, I was hoping I could get a little help in reading the output of Amanda (2.6) when I get the completion emails from it. Its a new install and I find it confusing on why it makes some statements in the information email after it completes the backup.
Here is the information from the email and what I assume it is refering to, please correct me if I am making the wrong assumptions on what this is telling me. STATISTICS: Total Full Incr. -------- -------- -------- Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:08 Run Time (hrs:min) 12:47 Dump Time (hrs:min) 9:04 9:04 0:00 Output Size (meg) 1446225.1 1446225.1 0.0 Original Size (meg) 1446225.1 1446225.1 0.0 Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- -- Filesystems Dumped 2 2 0 Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 45348.8 45348.8 -- All pretty straight forward above; total run time almost 13hours, capacity backed up 1.44TB, no compression. 2 FS's in my DLE, and the Dump rate was 45MB/s . Tape Time (hrs:min) 7:07 7:07 0:00 Tape Size (meg) 1446225.1 1446225.1 0.0 Tape Used (%) 359.4 359.4 0.0 Filesystems Taped 2 2 0 Chunks Taped 40 40 0 Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 57752.5 57752.5 -- Here is where it gets fuzzy... and not in logic. Tape size... the amount that was put to tape? Tape Used... 359%? Avg Tp Write Rate, the holding disk wrote to the tape drive @ 57MB/s....correct? USAGE BY TAPE: Label Time Size % Nb Nc AmaTor-002 2:29 470300448K 114.1 0 12 AmaTor-003 2:27 494028950K 119.9 1 13 AmaTor-004 2:00 464873216K 112.8 0 12 AmaTor-005 0:20 86912230K 21.1 1 3 How did my Tapes load more then their capacity of 360GB each (LTO3 @ 400GB native capacity - 40GB tape split size). NOTES: planner: Adding new disk archive2.win.mrxfx.com:/array/sata-1/maxpayne/SHOTS/148Ax050. planner: Adding new disk archive2.win.mrxfx.com:/array/sata-1/maxpayne/SHOTS/033x010. taper: Will request retry of failed split part. taper: Will request retry of failed split part. taper: Will request retry of failed split part. I cant tell if this is an error or just for my information, I assume it caused by the Tape Split Size value we use. DUMP SUMMARY: DUMPER STATS TAPER STATS HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s -------------------------- ------------------------------------- ------------- archive2.win -TS/033x010 0 722933590 722933590 -- 198:16 60769.8 241:30 49893.5 archive2.win -S/148Ax050 0 758000870 758000870 -- 346:00 36512.1 185:53 67962.4 And finally this final output which tells me that bandwidth was different for the 2 FS's , why would one throughput be higher then the other one. Thanks for the decryption services :) . +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +----------------------------------------------------------------------