You have to tell su to run the amanda users .profile . "su - amanda" will do
this for you.. If you omit the "-", su won't reconfigure the child shell's
environment for amanda, it will simply continue with your existing environment.
Compare:
root@colias:~# echo $PATH
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
root@colias:~# su jlellis -c 'echo $PATH'
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games
( above, the jlellis shell isn't a login shell, so it didn't execute the
/home/jlellis/.bash_profile setup, and thus did not setup my usual jlellis
PATH.)
root@colias:~# su - jlellis -c 'echo $PATH'
/usr/local/sbin/PavlovDHCP:/usr/local/sbin/PavlovAbuse:/home/jlellis/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/sbin
( Above, su told bash to run my .bash_profile, so it shows my personal PATH
is set, not root's.)
root@colias:~# su - jlellis -c "echo $PATH"
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
(This one fails because I used " instead of '. Thus, what the shell got was
"echo /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games", a constant
string.)
You have two issues confusing your debugging: " vs ' in your -c parameter, and
whether su runs
Your profile script, or not.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
Sent: Friday, February 6, 2015 15:09
To: Joi L. Ellis; amanda-users
Subject: Re: An odd problem...
On Friday, February 06, 2015 03:08:42 PM you wrote:
> Amcheck is a compiled binary, not a script.
>
> With bash, if the path to a script's interpreter is invalid, it says
> so with
>
> -bash: ./jj: /bash: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
>
> But if it can't find the command you asked for, you get:
>
> -bash: ./jjj: No such file or directory
>
> This is why I specify either 'sudo -i' or 'bash -l' when launching a
> shell under a new name. The parameters tell sudo and/or the shell to
> launch a full 'login' shell, which ensures your PATH is set properly.
> If you omit that, it tends to simply use the existing PATH you had in
> your original shell.
>
Doing an su amanda -c "echo $PATH"
shows the first 3 colon separated paths as all /usr/local/sbin where amcheck is
installed.
This is the amanda $PATH
/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
and because I've been playing, root now has 3 copies of that first path.
But it can't find it. Owned by root:amanda on both the old drive and the new
one. And I'm walking around with half a cold cuppa, shaking my head.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org
> [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie Sent:
> Friday, February 6, 2015 13:50
> To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: Re: An odd problem...
>
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:11:23PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greetings all;
>
> ...
>
> > then:
> > su amanda -c "amcheck Daily"
> > root@coyote:/home/amanda# su amanda -c "amcheck Daily"
> > su: Authentication failure
> > (Ignored)
> > sh: 1: amcheck: not found
> >
> > But amcheck is sitting in /usr/local/sbin. And its in the $PATH.
>
> Is amcheck a script, possibly perl or shell. If so, check the first
> line which specifies the interpreter. Something like:
>
> #!/bin/perl
>
> If it specifies the wrong location the shell reports "not found" just
> like it would for the script not found.
>
> Wish they would change that message.
>
> Jon
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS
