Debian Jessie, amanda 3.3.6

After a backup, amreport says things like:

STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
  /-- sbox.slsware.net / lev 1 STRANGE
  sendbackup: start [sbox.slsware.net:/ level 1]
  sendbackup: info BACKUP=/bin/tar
  sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/bin/tar -xpGf - ...
  sendbackup: info end
  ? /bin/tar: ./boot: directory is on a different filesystem; not dumped
  ? /bin/tar: ./home: directory is on a different filesystem; not dumped
  ? /bin/tar: ./mnt: directory is on a different filesystem; not dumped
  ? /bin/tar: ./tmp: directory is on a different filesystem; not dumped
  ? /bin/tar: ./usr: directory is on a different filesystem; not dumped
  ? /bin/tar: ./var: directory is on a different filesystem; not dumped
  | Total bytes written: 2938880 (2.9MiB, 6.6MiB/s)
  sendbackup: size 2870
  sendbackup: end

The directory may be on a different partition, but it's not on a different filesystem. They're all on /, and right at the top. They're all RAID 1 too, if that makes any difference.

Part of my disklist is:

## sbox
sbox.slsware.net        /               high-tar 40
sbox.slsware.net        /boot           high-tar 40
sbox.slsware.net        /home           high-tar 40
sbox.slsware.net        /tmp            high-tar 40
sbox.slsware.net        /usr            high-tar 40
sbox.slsware.net        /var            high-tar 40

Notice that it doesn't ask for /mnt...

Then down at the bottom it says:

DUMP SUMMARY:
HOSTNAME            DISK        L ORIG-kB  OUT-kB ...
-------------------------------------------------
sbox.slsware.net    /           1    2870    2870
sbox.slsware.net    /boot       1      10      10
sbox.slsware.net    /home       0 7691120 7691120
sbox.slsware.net    /tmp        1     280     280
sbox.slsware.net    /usr        0 3114740 3114740
sbox.slsware.net    /var        0 1167590 1167590

It says some of the DLEs aren't dumped, then it dumps them. And I've restored from some of the 'not dumped' DLEs, using amrecover (so amanda's directory of the tape exists).

I've been backing up with Amanda for years, and didn't see this back then. (This has been happening for quite a while; I'm just wondering about it now.)

I haven't been able to find the error. What's wrong (if anything)?

--
Glenn English

Reply via email to