On Monday 23 December 2019 21:16:26 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 11:47:21 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > The first, /dev/sda contains the current operating system. This
> > includes /usr/dumps as a holding disk area.
> >
> > The next box of rust, /dev/sdb, is the previous os, kept in case I
> > need to go get something I forgot to copy over when I first made the
> > present install. It also contains this /user/dumps directory but
> > currently unused as it normally isn't mounted.
> >
> > Wash, rinse and repeat for /dev/sdc. normally not mounted.
>
> [...]
>
> > What would be the effect of moving from a single holding area on
> > /dev/sda as it is now operated, compared to mounting and using the
> > holding directorys that already exist on /dev/sdb and /dev/sdc?
> > Seems to me this
>
> Right... mount the sdb and sdc holding-disk filesystems, then add
> additional holdingdisk{} definitions pointing to those directories to
> your amanda.conf.
>
> > should result in less pounding on the /dev/sda seek mechanism while
> > backing up /dev/sda as it would move those writes to a different
> > spindle, with less total time spent seeking overall.
> >
> > Am I on the right track?  How does amanda determine which holding
> > disk area to use for a given DLE in that case?
>
> Yes, I think that's the right track.
>
> I have not investigated this in depth, but as far as I know Amanda
> doesn't have a way to notice that a particular DLE is on physical
> device local-sda and that a particular holding-disk directory is also
> on that same physical device, and thus choose to use a different
> holding disk for that particular DLE.  (It does attempt to spread out
> temporary files across the various holding-disk directories -- it just
> presumably can't take into account the physical device origin of a
> particular DLE when decided where to send that DLEs temporary file.)
>
> So if you left your existing holding-disk definition as well as adding
> the ones for sdb and sdc, about one third of the time (theoretically)
> Amanda would end up using sda for the holding disk for the
> os-files-on-sda's DLE, and you'd end up with some thrashing.  As far
> as I know, the only way to completely avoid that is to to remove the
> holdingdisk section pointing to sda from the config and use only the
> other two.
>
> However, as long as you are using more than two dumpers in your
> config, I'm pretty sure that having more than two physical drives in
> use for holding disks will still come out ahead, because there will
> also be some thrashing between the holding-disk files for different
> DLEs that are being backed up in parallel.  So unless the server's sda
> DLE was a huge portion of the overall data being backed up across your
> entire disklist, I'd guess that the occasional thrashing on sda when
> backing up that DLE is a price worth paying to have the holdingdisk
> activity spread across as many physical drives as possible.
>
> (Of course it wouldn't be a bad idea to try it for a dumpcycle with
> three holding-disk drives and then comment out the entry for the
> holding disk on sda and try that for a few runs at least and see how
> the performance compares in reality on your actual installation...)
>
>
>                                               Nathan

Sounds good, so I'll try it.  Also, where is the best explanation 
for "bumpmult"? I don't seem to be getting the results I expect.

Merry Christamas everybody.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>------ Nathan Stratton Treadway  -  natha...@ontko.com  -  Mid-Atlantic
> region Ray Ontko & Co.  -  Software consulting services  -  
> http://www.ontko.com/ GPG Key:
> http://www.ontko.com/~nathanst/gpg_key.txt   ID: 1023D/ECFB6239 Key
> fingerprint = 6AD8 485E 20B9 5C71 231C  0C32 15F3 ADCD ECFB 6239



Copyright 2019 by Maurice E. Heskett
Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Reply via email to