> On Dec 3, 2020, at 1:46 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger <s...@amanda.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 01.12.20 um 13:44 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> 
>> With the simple wrapper in place amrecover correctly runs through (*and* 
>> pigz is used for the amdump and the amrecover step).
>> Tomorrow, when the admin there will insert a specific tape for me, I will 
>> test that from the tape I used for the failing tests a few days ago.
> 
> With the tape the same amrecover process did *not* work, same behavior as 
> without the wrapper.


I recall something about  “the decompress is done where the compress was done”
and also “now all decompression happens on the server.”

It might be worth making the same wrapper be in place on both the client and 
the server?
(couldn’t hurt)

Deb Baddorf
Fermilab

Reply via email to