On 19. 1. 2013 Sven Krohlas wrote: > Matěj Laitl wrote: > > Translate more strings as string freeze is over! > > the intend of string freeze is not to get nice statistics but to give > translators the chance to translate as much as possible. Adding i18n() > calls late or after the freeze contradicts that goal.
I must agree. However the string freeze policy "no new i18n strings" also contradicts the goal. The reason might be the 75% barrier for inclusion. But if you look at the commit closely, two thirds are just i18n string refactorings on general changes/corrections to i18n strings - for these the time after freeze should be completely appropriate. Matěj _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel