> On March 28, 2013, 4:44 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > Is there a wish request or any other motivation to implement this feature? 
> > I don't see many reasons why user should care that the lyrics have been 
> > just downloaded or already cached. On the other hand, user may want to know 
> > whether lyrics have been previously edited by her. Additionally, some file 
> > formats allow storing lyrics in tags, it would be nice if Amarok supported 
> > it. (then it would make sense to show her what is the source of lyrics 
> > being shown)
> 
> mayank jha wrote:
>     I thought perhaps this was needed in context/LyricsManager.cpp
>     230:        // TODO: add some sort of feedback that we could not fetch 
> new ones
>     Thanks for your suggestions! Will try to work on the edited/unedited 
> feature soon!
>
> 
> Matěj Laitl wrote:
>     > I thought perhaps this was needed in context/LyricsManager.cpp
>     > 230:        // TODO: add some sort of feedback that we could not fetch 
> new ones
>     
>     Well, this is a valid TODO, but what you're implemented doesn't resolve 
> it. The wanted feedback was we tried but failed to download lyrics, not to 
> distinguish between cached and just-downloaded ones.
>     
>     > Thanks for your suggestions! Will try to work on the edited/unedited 
> feature soon!
>     
>     Well, that may require a fair amount of new infrastructure and is not 
> really suited for newcomers, but no-one will obviously prevent you from 
> trying.

Is the feedback required to be displayed onto the screen ? or is it related to 
the code part ? Also doesnt showing cached lyrics indicate that we tried but 
could not find any new lyrics?


- mayank


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109470/#review30013
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 27, 2013, 7:22 p.m., mayank jha wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109470/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 27, 2013, 7:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> It required modifications, when there is no change in the lyrics downloaded 
> and lyrics retrieved from cache the title display of the lyrics browser 
> changes to "Cached Lyrics" from "Lyrics" so we can tell the difference 
> between old and new. 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/context/engines/lyrics/LyricsEngine.cpp 2befa91 
>   src/context/applets/lyrics/LyricsApplet.cpp 2394964 
>   src/context/engines/lyrics/LyricsEngine.h b187b73 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109470/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Its working fine!
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mayank jha
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Reply via email to