> On June 11, 2013, 9:26 a.m., Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> > Vedant, you really need to talk to us on amarok-devel@kde.org or in #amarok 
> > before venturing in fixing obscure feature requests. It is highly unlikely 
> > this is a desired feature for the Amarok Team, and it should not be solved 
> > in Amarok itself.
> 
> Vedant Agarwala wrote:
>     Oh I'm sorry. I didn't know the protocol. I thought it was a confirmed 
> bug and it needed fixing. So this is just some work wasted?
> 
> Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
>     Well, it is a Wish, not a bug, and just if it is requested by two users 
> doesn't make this a valid feature. Everybody can request features, that 
> doesn't make them valid, and if we would implement all open wishes we could 
> as well stop working completely, as many are contradicting each other. In 
> general, we do not confirm wishes, if this was confirmed by another user this 
> is hard to avoid, but it doesn't make it a valid feature.
>     
>     In general: all new features nee to be discussed on the mailing list 
> before even starting to work on. In particular newcomers should always ask on 
> the mailing list before starting to work on something, as the core team is 
> the one that decides what goes in Amarok and what not.
>     
>     Sorry if you have wasted time on this, but I remember having told you 
> that the amarok-devel@kde.org mailing list is where everything needs to be 
> discussed, so if you want to avoid losing time on obscure features you really 
> need to discuss this on the mailing list before starting to work on them.

Well the earlier bugs I had fixed, I did not talk about them on the mailing 
lists. But now that you have mentioned it, I remember commenting on a bug that 
I wanted to fix, on the KDE bugtracking system. I started working on them only 
after confirmation. I should've done that here too. Actually I thought that 
"confirmed" bugs are confirmed by the Amarok team. My bad it seems.

Anyway, this review and another recent one ( 
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111038/ ) seem to be the result of the same 
misunderstanding by me. Now, I 
will make sure to confirm before starting any work so that such things don't 
take place in future.

I want to become a developer for Amarok and with every review I learn more 
about the code and the community.


- Vedant


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110934/#review34125
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 10, 2013, 7:04 p.m., Vedant Agarwala wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110934/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 10, 2013, 7:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds a "Offline Mode" to the "Amarok" menu. In Offline Mode, 
> The::networkAccessManager()->getData(...) returns NULL, and prints a error() 
> message.
> Also, I have updated existing code so that it checks whether Amarok is in 
> Offline Mode before placing the getData request.
> However, this is not a fail safe mechanism. Newer codes can use the 
> QNetworkAccessManager::get(...) direcrtly or make use of the 
> The::networkAccessManager in other ways. Scripts cannot do this since its 
> methods check first but this too can be changed. So, care still has to be 
> taken while writing newer code. I have mentioned the same as comments in the 
> code.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 229111.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=229111
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/ActionClasses.h 0187402 
>   src/ActionClasses.h 0187402 
>   src/ActionClasses.h 0187402 
>   src/ActionClasses.cpp cce6f20 
>   src/ActionClasses.cpp cce6f20 
>   src/ActionClasses.cpp cce6f20 
>   src/MainWindow.cpp af47db7 
>   src/MainWindow.cpp af47db7 
>   src/MainWindow.cpp af47db7 
>   src/amarokconfig.kcfg e00325d 
>   src/amarokconfig.kcfg e00325d 
>   src/amarokconfig.kcfg e00325d 
>   src/context/applets/photos/PhotosScrollWidget.cpp b5e872a 
>   src/context/applets/photos/PhotosScrollWidget.cpp b5e872a 
>   src/context/applets/similarartists/ArtistWidget.cpp 511f641 
>   src/context/applets/similarartists/ArtistWidget.cpp 511f641 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsApplet.cpp 38742df 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsApplet.cpp 38742df 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsMapWidget.h 99e55b2 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsMapWidget.h 99e55b2 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsMapWidget.cpp 9c11506 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsMapWidget.cpp 9c11506 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsWidget.cpp 323ec1e 
>   src/context/applets/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsWidget.cpp 323ec1e 
>   src/context/applets/wikipedia/WikipediaApplet.cpp 0f7a3b0 
>   src/context/applets/wikipedia/WikipediaApplet.cpp 0f7a3b0 
>   src/context/engines/labels/LabelsEngine.cpp ad3ae71 
>   src/context/engines/labels/LabelsEngine.cpp ad3ae71 
>   src/context/engines/photos/PhotosEngine.cpp f9f8fd5 
>   src/context/engines/photos/PhotosEngine.cpp f9f8fd5 
>   src/context/engines/similarartists/SimilarArtistsEngine.cpp 898beb4 
>   src/context/engines/similarartists/SimilarArtistsEngine.cpp 898beb4 
>   src/context/engines/tabs/TabsEngine.cpp 24a89df 
>   src/context/engines/tabs/TabsEngine.cpp 24a89df 
>   src/context/engines/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsEngine.cpp b869a3c 
>   src/context/engines/upcomingevents/UpcomingEventsEngine.cpp b869a3c 
>   src/context/engines/wikipedia/WikipediaEngine.cpp 0b75f15 
>   src/context/engines/wikipedia/WikipediaEngine.cpp 0b75f15 
>   src/context/widgets/DropPixmapItem.cpp 62b0e90 
>   src/context/widgets/DropPixmapItem.cpp 62b0e90 
>   src/covermanager/CoverFetcher.cpp 3cf32cc 
>   src/covermanager/CoverFetcher.cpp 3cf32cc 
>   src/covermanager/CoverFoundDialog.cpp 6d7efa2 
>   src/covermanager/CoverFoundDialog.cpp 6d7efa2 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzFinder.cpp 6892232 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicBrainzFinder.cpp 6892232 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicDNSFinder.cpp d393211 
>   src/musicbrainz/MusicDNSFinder.cpp d393211 
>   src/network/NetworkAccessManagerProxy.h 6285f0f 
>   src/network/NetworkAccessManagerProxy.h 6285f0f 
>   src/network/NetworkAccessManagerProxy.h 6285f0f 
>   src/network/NetworkAccessManagerProxy.cpp a2694bf 
>   src/network/NetworkAccessManagerProxy.cpp a2694bf 
>   src/network/NetworkAccessManagerProxy.cpp a2694bf 
>   src/scriptengine/AmarokNetworkScript.cpp 0eaa440 
>   src/scriptengine/AmarokNetworkScript.cpp 0eaa440 
>   src/services/ampache/AmpacheAccountLogin.cpp 26aebed 
>   src/services/ampache/AmpacheAccountLogin.cpp 26aebed 
>   src/services/ampache/AmpacheServiceCollection.cpp 140c465 
>   src/services/ampache/AmpacheServiceCollection.cpp 140c465 
>   src/services/ampache/AmpacheServiceQueryMaker.cpp b94c3b0 
>   src/services/ampache/AmpacheServiceQueryMaker.cpp b94c3b0 
>   src/services/lastfm/AvatarDownloader.cpp b54b252 
>   src/services/lastfm/AvatarDownloader.cpp b54b252 
>   src/services/lastfm/LastFmService.cpp 4c100c4 
>   src/services/lastfm/LastFmService.cpp 4c100c4 
>   src/services/lastfm/LastFmServiceSettings.h 82b9b00 
>   src/services/lastfm/LastFmServiceSettings.h 82b9b00 
>   src/services/lastfm/LastFmServiceSettings.cpp 086997e 
>   src/services/lastfm/LastFmServiceSettings.cpp 086997e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110934/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing done. Builds and runs. I even made sure error messages were being 
> shown (and no other undesired effects, like a crash, were taking place) if 
> The::networkAccessManager()->getData(...) was called inappropriately.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vedant Agarwala
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Reply via email to