Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
uvscan is not very up-to-date and is linked against libraries from days
gone past, thus causing problems on modern systems (which don't have
these old libraries).
Re: [AMaViS-user] clamav vs. uvscan?
Also, it doesn't perform well
Why not run the two side-by-side and then show that clamd kicks
uvscan's ass?
Thanks Ralf -- and thanks to everyone else who responded. I'm going to
take the advice given and set up both scanners for a few weeks and see
how they do.
Also Ralf -- thanks for the new Postfix book. I thought I knew
something about email before I started reading it!
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
