At 14:19 12.12.2006, you wrote: > >but, I'm interested to hear what others use; > >are commercial scanners significantly better than Clam ? > > > > > > >We use Kaspersky an ClamAV. ClamAV is quite good on current viruses, >especially phishing attacks - sometimes even faster in the update than >the notorious fast kaspersky team. However, the clam people -as far as I >understand it - concentrateon current viruses. Older viruses are not >normally detected. Same is true for Office macro viruses. So probably a >combination of ClamAV and a commercial scanner is a good idea.
i agree with that. we are using McAfee uvscan as a backup scanner for many years without a problem, but since it is a command line tool it may not be used in very lage and high perfomance setups... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
