Mark Martinec wrote the following on 3/21/2007 6:51 AM -0800: > Bob, > > >> ah, does SA get any indication that clamav thinks the email is a phish? >> > > No, currectly not. An artificial header field could be inserted I guess, > but for the moment I don't think it is really needed, these phishing > scams collect enough spam points by themselves. > I like the artificial header idea. If you could at least make it an optional flag that would be great. Would be nice to be able to add a few SA points if ClamAV detects phish, image, scam, etc., messages, otherwise it doesn't make much sense to use the additional ClamAV signature files provided by SaneSucurity and MSRBL.
Bill > >> Otherwise I guess turning off phishing signatures (as I currently have) >> is pretty similar in affect. >> > > ...except for the absence of additional 14 score points, > contributed by @virus_name_to_spam_score_maps. > > Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
