mouss wrote: > Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: >>> -----Messaggio originale----- >>> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user- >>> >>> Gary V wrote: >>> >>>> I am doing some tests on a Debian machine with the Debian 2.4.2 >>>> package and the postfixadmin vacation.pl script and I noticed that >>>> because the vacation program sends a mail out on the recipient's >>>> >>> behalf >>> >>>> the sender is now a penpal. If a spammer sends out more than one >>>> message using the same sender address the second and subsequent mails >>>> get a lower score. Just an observation. This program uses sendmail so >>>> I personally will fix this by disabling content_filter for the pickup >>>> service. >>>> >>>> >>> an auto-responder should use "<>" as the envelope sender... >>> >> >>
> I said auto-responder when I mean a vacation style auto-responder. see > below. >> Oh, really? >> >> Is it stated by an RFC or is it just a commonsense practice? >> > Any dedicated address may be chosen, provided some care is taken. the > empty sender has the advantage of being a simple choice (no need to > create a dedicate address) if you don't want to get bounces (which is > the case for vacation responders, but may not be good for other > responders. but these require dedicated addresses and scripts anyway). > In any case, using the original recipient idea is the worst choice. > See section 3.3 of > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3834.txt > for more infos. Good idea. I will modify the supplied script. Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
