On 11/4/07, Leon Kolchinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm installing a new mail server on Gentoo (moving from SLES9), > > When I send some test mails I can see that most of processing time is spent > on: > SMTP DATA: 37 (34%)38 > fwd-connect: 17 (15%)77 > > Is there a way to improve these timings or is it OK? > > Log snippet: > ----------- > Nov 4 11:24:14 mail2 amavis[9998]: (09998-04) TIMING [total 108 ms] - SMTP > greeting: 2 (2%)2, SMTP EHLO: 0 (0%)2, SMTP pre-MAIL: 0 (0%)2, SMTP > pre-DATA-flush: 2 (2%)4, SMTP DATA: 36 (33%)37, check_init: 1 (1%)38, > digest_hdr: 0 (0%)38, digest_body: 0 (0%)38, gen_mail_id: 1 (1%)39, > mime_decode: 10 (9%)47, get-file-type2: 8 (8%)55, decompose_part: 1 (1%)56, > parts_decode: 0 (0%)56, AV-scan-1: 4 (4%)60, update_cache: 1 (1%)61, > decide_mail_destiny: 1 (1%)61, fwd-connect: 17 (15%)77, fwd-mail-pip: 3 > (2%)79, fwd-rcpt-pip: 0 (0%)79, fwd-data-chkpnt: 0 (0%)79, write-header: 1 > (1%)80, fwd-data-contents: 0 (0%)80, fwd-end-chkpnt: 12 (11%)91, > prepare-dsn: 1 (1%)91, main_log_entry: 7 (6%)98, update_snmp: 1 (1%)99, SMTP > pre-response: 0 (0%)99, SMTP response: 0 (0%)99, unlink-2-files: 1 (1%)100, > rundown: 0 (0%)100 Nov 4 11:24:14 mail2 postfix/smtpd[19527]: disconnect > from leon.mydomain.com[192.168.41.33] Nov 4 11:24:15 mail2 > postfix/smtp[19545]: 6AAC98D15: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > relay=mr3.domain.com[192.168.1.219]:25, delay=1.1, > delays=0.01/0.01/0.1/0.95, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 Ok: queued as > AEA4B15E9D4) Nov 4 11:24:15 mail2 postfix/qmgr[19401]: 6AAC98D15: removed > > > A snippet from master.cf: > ------------------------- > # ========================================================================== > # service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args > # (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (100) > # ========================================================================== > smtp inet n - n - - smtpd > -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings > smtps inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes > -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes > -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings > submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes > -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings > > smtp-amavis unix - - y - 2 smtp > -o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200 > -o disable_dns_lookups=yes > 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd > -o content_filter= > -o local_recipient_maps= > -o relay_recipient_maps= > -o smtpd_restriction_classes= > -o smtpd_client_restrictions= > -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= > -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= > -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,reject > -o mynetworks=127.0.0.0/8 > -o strict_rfc821_envelopes=yes > -o smtpd_error_sleep_time=0 > -o smtpd_soft_error_limit=1001 > -o smtpd_hard_error_limit=1000 > -o > receive_override_options=no_header_body_checks,no_unknown_recipient_checks > > > > # postconf -n > alias_maps = hash:/etc/mail/aliases > broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes > canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical command_directory = /usr/sbin > command_time_limit = 3600s config_directory = /etc/postfix content_filter = > smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10026 daemon_directory = /usr/lib/postfix > debug_peer_level = 2 defer_transports = disable_dns_lookups = no > header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks html_directory = > /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.3.6/html inet_interfaces = all mail_owner = postfix > mail_spool_directory = /var/mail mailbox_command = mailbox_size_limit = 0 > mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp mailq_path = > /usr/bin/mailq manpage_directory = /usr/share/man masquerade_classes = > envelope_sender, header_sender, header_recipient masquerade_exceptions = > root message_size_limit = 10240000 mime_header_checks = > pcre:/etc/postfix/body_checks mydestination = $myhostname, > localhost.$mydomain, mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-mydestination.cf > mydomain = mail2.edu.haifa.ac.il > myhostname = mail2.edu.haifa.ac.il > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.40.0/23 newaliases_path = > /usr/bin/newaliases owner_request_special = no queue_directory = > /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.3.6/readme > recipient_delimiter = + > relayhost = > relocated_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relocated sample_directory = /etc/postfix > sender_canonical_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-canonical.cf > sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail > setgid_group = postdrop > smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, > reject_unknown_client smtpd_data_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining > smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_helo_restrictions = > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, > permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_unauth_destination, > check_recipient_access regexp:/etc/postfix/mailboxfull, > reject_invalid_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_sender, > reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_sender_domain, > reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_rbl_client > zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, > reject_rbl_client safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client > list.dsbl.org, check_client_access > hash:/etc/postfix/client_checks, check_sender_access > regexp:/etc/postfix/filter-catchall.regexp, permit > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes > smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous > smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_client_access > hash:/etc/postfix/reset_content_filter hash:/etc/postfix/access > smtpd_tls_CAfile = /etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes > smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem smtpd_tls_key_file = > /etc/ssl/certs/cert.pem smtpd_tls_loglevel = 1 smtpd_tls_received_header = > yes smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s smtpd_use_tls = yes > strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom > transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport > unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 virtual_alias_maps = > hash:/etc/postfix/virtual, mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual.cf > > > > Best Regards, > Leon Kolchinsky >
My 0.02 Well, the whole message only took 108ms. I think this is why the percentages are so high. If the message had been sent through SpamAssassin, the overall time would have increased significantly and these percentages would have dropped considerably. You are only looking at 37 and 17ms. Plus, we don't know what size the message was so it would be hard to say if the values of those timings are within the expected range. Off hand, I see no problem. -- Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
