Dave McGuire wrote: > On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:39 PM, MrC wrote: >>> Hey folks. It looks to me like amavisd-new isn't logging the >>> SpamAssassin rules summary for messages that *don't* get tagged >>> as spam. I can't believe I've never noticed this before, but >>> sitting here staring at a log file, this seems to be the case. >> Lower the value of $sa_tag_level_deflt, as in : >> >> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef; # add spam info headers if at, or >> above that level > > It's already set to undef...I'm not talking about the addition of > headers to messages, I'm talking about the logging (to syslog, in my > case) of each message as amavisd processes it. >
What is your $log_level setting ? SPAM-TAG entries will be added at $log_level=2. See also "syslog priorities are now dynamically derived" in the RELEASE_NOTES file for dynamic priorities. I have a little blurb also in the README file for amavis-logwatch. Dec 6 10:07:24 mailhost amavis[22519]: (22519-05) SPAM-TAG, <from> -> <to>, No, score=-0.528 required=6.29 tests=[AWL=-0.901, BAYES_05=-1.11, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] MrC > -Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
