On Apr 14, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:

>> Is this a good idea?
>
> If your software is finding such strings in a _body_ of a mail,
> it is seriously flawed and needs to be fixed. If it is only looking
> at the header, you are already on the safe side by default.

The duplicate header tags are in the header of the file (sorry for the  
misinformed comment about the body).  Also, the  
$remove_existing_spam_headers variable is undefined in my  
configuration file.

I should be getting the default behavior but duplicate header tags are  
appearing.  Below is an example.

The TMail library keeps header info in a hash, so it's retaining the  
last 'X-Spam-Score' header encountered with a value of '*****',  
instead of the one with '16.06'.  If duplicate headers shouldn't exist  
then maybe I won't waste my time getting TMail to use an array instead  
of a hash.  Can you tell from this example why the duplicates would be  
occurring?

Jose


Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: spam-quarantine
X-Envelope-From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Envelope-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Quarantine-ID: <u79lpchtlym0>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Score: 16.07
X-Spam-Level: ****************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.07 tag=-1000 tag2=6.31 kill=6.31
        tests=[BAYES_50=4, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001,
        RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=2, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067, URIBL_RED=0.001,
        URIBL_SC_SURBL=4, URIBL_WS_SURBL=4]
Received: from smtp.stat.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (mta.stat.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id u79lpchtlym0 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-13.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-13.smtp.ucla.edu  
[169.232.46.249])
        by smtp.stat.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8037C42DB2
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dino.ess.ucla.edu (dino.ess.ucla.edu [128.97.31.199])
        by smtp-13.smtp.ucla.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3EIhFZM010543
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:43:15 -0700
X-geo_ess_ucla_edu_-MailScanner-Watermark:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from zephyr.ess.ucla.edu (zephyr [128.97.31.1])
        by dino.ess.ucla.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3EIhFhq010692
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 79.26.30.109 (host109-30-dynamic.26-79- 
r.retail.telecomitalia.it [79.26.30.109])
        by zephyr.ess.ucla.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id  
m3EIkj1l010876
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "hobard leanne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *****'s hidden cam video
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:55:27 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C89E5F.0478ED4C"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-geo_ess_ucla_edu_-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP  
for more information
X-geo_ess_ucla_edu_-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-geo_ess_ucla_edu_-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Probable-Spam: no
X-Spam-Hits: 4.702
X-Spam-Score: *****
X-Spam-Report:  
HTML_MESSAGE 
,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,URIBL_RED,URIBL_WS_SURBL
X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.46.249





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/

Reply via email to