Thanks Gary,

this is what I was looking for, I have little knowledge about exchange
and is still in the process of learning as I go.

I can get hard 5XX error on my primary domain below (mydomain1.com) and
the Sender Filter seems to kick in as expected.

However when I try to send a random email to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Exchange simply accepts it.  I have been googling for some pointers to
this but I have none so far, would you have any idea why this is so?

Many thanks

CP


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # telnet 192.168.10.36 25
Trying 192.168.10.36...
Connected to 192.168.10.36.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 smtp.mydomain.com My Company Tue, 24 Jun 2008
15:39:41 +1000 
HELO hotmail.com
250 scurrex3.mydomain1.com Hello [10.0.2.74]
MAIL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 5.1.1 User unknown
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # telnet 192.168.10.36 25
Trying 192.168.10.36...
Connected to 192.168.10.36.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 smtp.mydomain.com My Company Tue, 24 Jun 2008
15:40:12 +1000 
HELO hotmail.com
250 scurrex3.mydomain1.com Hello [10.0.2.74]
MAIL From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK
RCPT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
DATA
354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
test
test
.
250 2.6.0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Queued mail for delivery
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # 




Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis bottleneck?
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:03:30PM -0600
Quoting Gary V ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

: On 6/23/08, Christian Purnomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: 
: > I have done some testing re option #2 below, it seems that MS Exchange
: > 2003 does not 'reject non-existent user' upon probing hence I have to
: > cross this out (unless I'm wrong on this).  I tested this by doing a few
: > test injections to the Exchange server and all invalid recipients were
: > simply accepted by exchange smtp.
: >
: > Option #1 is feasible, I have done some googling and noticed there 2
: > ways to do this, active vs passive where active is to get the exhcnage
: > query the AD and passive is where you regularly do a full export of the
: > email addresses in AD and feed them into postfix. I'm testing the
: > 'active' at present.
: >
: > Thanks for your input.
: >
: > CP
: >
: 
: Passive is typically used so AD does not get hammered. Fortunately you
: can (and should) configure Exchange 2003 to reject mail to invalid
: users. I have not done this myself, but this might be the way to do
: it:
: 
https://support.interjuncture.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kbarticleid=25
: 
: -- 
: Gary V
: 
: -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
: It's the best place to buy or sell services for
: just about anything Open Source.
: http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
: _______________________________________________
: AMaViS-user mailing list
: [email protected]
: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
: AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
: AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/

Reply via email to