> 
> 
> Btw, typical OOO messages would not be touched by a bounce killer,
> because they do not have a header section of the original
> mail attached.
> 
Was SA's 'vbounce' that did that (and, yes, ) since it didn't have any
section of the orginal email, SA thought it was backscatter.

OOO messages, AND return receipt to.

Funny thing, all this with message_id 1, OOO messages and me not smart
enough to set the tflags noautolearn, right at Christmas when there were a
BUNCH of OOO messages really munged things up for me..

One let in spam (message_id 1), one blocked legit email (vbounce score set
for 99, autolearn, legit users send back an OOO, and AWL learns them as
spammers)

All in a day.

Brings up a point:  we should read the SA and amavisd-new documentation,
once a month, just so we don't miss something.
-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
>|SECNAP Network Security
Finalist 2009 Network Products Guide Hot Companies
FreeBSD SpamAssassin Ports maintainer

_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
_________________________________________________________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected] 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user 
 AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 
 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ 

Reply via email to