Am 13.01.2010 17:33, schrieb Mark Martinec:
> Felix,
>
> There is nothing in amavisd to suppress such log entries,
> and I don't think maia is different in this regard.
>
> Is your logging via a regular Unix syslogd, or are you using
> something fancier? Could be due to a suppression of same or similar
> log entries by a syslogd daemon. Try bumping up the amavisd log level
> and see what happens.
>
>    Mark
>

Thank you, Mark

I am using regular Unix syslogd. There is no supression like (last 
message repeated x times) as far as I know... I tried loglevel 0,1,2,3 
before I wrote to the mailing list but forgot to mention it. Now I tried 
even loglevel 5, but the same behaviour. What is interesting (and always 
the same) is the id...

The first correct GTUBE Mail has the same ID (not sub-id) like the first 
incorrect mail - to illustrate it:
First mail causes:
Jan 13 17:46:36 anthares amavis[26587]: (26587-01) ESMTP< MAIL FROM:

First mail WITHOUT the log entry has:
Jan 13 17:47:02 anthares amavis[26587]: (26587-02) ESMTP< MAIL FROM:

Has it something to do with number "xxxx-01" and "xxxx-02"? I discovered 
this appendix is rising further and further... 26587-05 or 26588-04 as 
example....

Btw - with loglevel 5 there are also logentries from amavisd - but not 
the required "blocked spam" one....
I got the following as last entry:
Jan 13 17:47:04 anthares amavis[26587]: (26587-02) one_response_for_all 
<b...@blub.com>: all DISCARD, '250 2.7.1 Ok, discarded, UBE, id=26587-02'

The first mails causes 3 more log entries after the entry above:
Jan 13 17:46:48 anthares amavis[26588]: (26588-01) parse_received: ; = 
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:46:47 +0100 (CET)\t(envelope-from b...@blub.com)/Wed, 
13 Jan 2010 17:46:47 +0100 (CET)\t(envelope-from b...@blub.com)//
Jan 13 17:46:48 anthares amavis[26588]: (26588-01) parse_received: ; = 
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:46:47 +0100 (CET)\t(envelope-from b...@blub.com)/Wed, 
13 Jan 2010 17:46:47 +0100 (CET)\t(envelope-from b...@blub.com)//
Jan 13 17:46:48 anthares amavis[26588]: (26588-01) Blocked SPAM, 
[x.x.x.x] [x.x.x.x] <b...@blub.com> -> <b...@receiver.net>, Message-ID: 
<4b4df8bf.5080...@blub.com>, Hits: 1003.059, 313 ms

All these lines are missing after two mails :-/

Do you have any idea what I can try? thank you very much in advance.

greetings
felix
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user 
 AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 
 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/ 

Reply via email to