Hi, I recently had problems concerning encrypted emails so I investigated a bit. Currently amavisd-new seems to do the following:
attachments containing an encrypted archive (e.g. zip) are marked as UNDECIPHERABLE, the mail gets flagged with CC_UNCHECKED. A gpg-encrypted attachment (correctly detected by file as "GPG encrypted data") is not marked or treated in any special way, it is delivered to the recipient even if I want to ban CC_UNCHECKED. A mail encrypted with PGP/MIME or S/MIME is not marked or treated in any special way, it is delivered to the recipient even if I want to ban CC_UNCHECKED. Is there any reason to treat encryption differently based on the method used? Wouldn't it make sense to mark gpg encrypted files and PGP/MIME and S/MIME as CC_UNCHECKED too? Kind regards, Gerd -- Address (better: trap) for people I really don't want to get mail from: jo...@cactusamerica.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
