On 9/29/10 8:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> I haven't done any benchmarks in this regard. Quarantining is generally a
> quick operation in comparison to all the rest, so it should not matter
> much one way or another. Which one is faster probably depends much on
> a file system of choice, or on the database setup.
and consider that the database still has to write to the hard disk, and
with filesystem, compression is easily implemented .
Our tests showed it faster to write, however: unless you enable the
sql logging, you don't have an easy way to search by subject
line/sender/ recipient.
All depends on what you need.
(oh, and if a LOT of sql logging. implement partitioning.)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
Please visit http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ regularly
For administrativa requests please send email to rainer at openantivirus dot
org
