* Eric Smith <[email protected]>: > humm, yes that looks like a candidate but no change in that either and no > new package as well. Why monday and not the many months before? I know, too > dang general of a question to ask, when I have the time I will try to get it > to fail while I am looking at it with logs set to debug. In the mean time I > will keep the setting $enable_db set to 0. > > Question, what downside is there not using berkeleyDB? > > amavisd_nanny will not work, is there any other performance issues that I > should worry about?
Not with recent amavis. Marc faded out some knowledge sharing between amavis child processes over a berkeleyDB in 2.7, because it has become ineffetive over time. There's no other feature coming to my mind - at least mine! p@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the list and archived for public access unless privacy is explicitely required and justified. saslfinger (debugging SMTP AUTH): <http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/>
