Sounds good to me!
On 2013-01-17 08:06, Jo Rhett wrote:
So I just went through a fresh new installation on a host, and to be honest I
found the documentation very hard to follow. Even given years of familiarity
with Amavis, just trying to dot the Is and cross the Ts led through a crazy
rereading of release notes and readmes and everything.
Crucial details, like how to use PenPals, are buried deep in the release notes.
As are hints for using sa-compiled rules.
Details like: do you need SA daemon running or not have no explicit answer.
(Not, I know from experience, but it should be easier to find)
At this point shouldn't we trim off documentation that's 5+ years old? Also,
remove references to things like amavis-milter that we have repeatedly said not
to use? At this point amavisd-milter by Peter Rohr is very stable and reliable.
