On Monday, December 01, 2014 09:18:45 AM Noel Butler wrote: > On 30/11/2014 22:42, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, A. Schulze wrote: > > Benny Pedersen: Upgrade to sa 3.4 where this work, else wait for next rule > > update, this is a > > work in progress thats only gives error when not using sa 3.4 At least here > > I *have* 3.4 but > > got the same warnings. > The problem is only fixed in trunk. All released versions have the > problem. > > Alex > > I was told it was going to be rolled back, but I guess not as of yet. > > Nobody should have to upgrade production machines to an alpha/beta/rc of > spamassassin simply to resolve this, which should have been detected and > realised under better QC. Agreed, but I haven't seen it anymore for two days.
-- Best regards Thomas Spuhler All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature ID 60114E63
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.