On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote: > On 08-03-16 19:15, @lbutlr wrote: >> On Mar 8, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote: >>> On 08-03-16 16:58, @lbutlr wrote: >>>> What is “.asc” since that is not a banned attachment. >>> >>> A pgp signature, this message has one >> >> There is no way that every one of these javascript-containing >> messages has a pgp signature. >> > > It's probably an evil javascript simply trying to mask as a pgp sig.
No. *EVERY* message that hits BANNED has the same pattern, .asc,<something>.js 100%. No exceptions. Considering I can count on one hand with not all the fingers the number of spam messages I’ve ever seen with faked PGP sig, this is something else. -- CURSIVE WRITING DOES NOT MEAN WHAT I THINK IT DOES Bart chalkboard Ep. 2F11