Marc Stürmer skrev den 2016-11-24 22:18:
Am 24.11.2016 um 22:04 schrieb Alexander Masidlover:
Thanks, I had been wondering about moving to SQL storage as we get a
reasonably large volume of email
through; however, I’m a bit concerned about doing all the set-up and
still getting the same result!
One serious advise: don't. Spamassassin's Bayes storage in SQL is slow
as swimming through molasses, it's no fun at all.
spamassassin is opensource feel free to make a bayes sql patch that
optimize sql bayes, i use sql bayes here on ssd drive without any issue
i just hate to see rspamd is more stable now then spamassassin in most
areas, its sadly true, only point where spamassassin still wins is its
simple to configure to make what one wants, but its does of the cost of
missing plugins to cover spam runs as 2016 is now
i like to see more fokus on rbl repution local, and url repution local,
free software should not help datafeeds to get paided for data
think about it
