I don't know of a why of just cleaning the ham. Unless someone knows of a way. 
I always have just cleared the whole database and started feeding it ham and 
spam.

From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 9:22 AM
To: Dino Edwards <dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>; amavis-users@amavis.org
Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM]RE: RE: RE: RE: different spamassassin behaviours

Great Dino! ;) I think you got to the point :)

My traning is almost just spam, we never feed ham to learn.
Do you think I can clear just the ham database? Is there any way?
I would like to retain the spam learnt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com<http://www.sonicle.com/>
Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com<http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon

________________________________


Da: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>
A: amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Data: 29 giugno 2017 14.14.57 CEST
Oggetto: RE: RE: RE: RE: different spamassassin behaviours

As you can see, this particular message has auto trained the bayes database 
that It's ham (autolearn=ham) when in fact it's supposed to be spam.

Here's what I recommend:


<![if !supportLists]>1.       <![endif]>Turn off autolearn

<![if !supportLists]>2.       <![endif]>Clear your bayes database and start 
over fresh

<![if !supportLists]>3.       <![endif]>Train your bayes database with 
legitimate ham and spam

It looks to me that the major issue you are having is your bayes database is 
completely jacked and the problem gets worse as each message comes in and 
incorrectly trains the bayes database.

The levels really depend on your setup, there is no magic levels per se. Train 
your database properly and you will be able to adjust them to a level that's 
good for your environment.




From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:58 AM
To: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>; 
amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Subject: RE: RE: RE: different spamassassin behaviours

I will check your suggestions (sa_tag_level_deflt , bayes_auto_learn ).

BTW, what are the level you would suggest, instead of my 5.0,10.0,10?

Meanwhile, look at the email I attached: even manually, spamassassin does not 
detect anything, while it's and evident spam...
Here are the manual result:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com<http://www.sonicle.com/>
Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com<http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon

________________________________


Da: Dino Edwards <dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>
A: amavis-users@amavis.org
Data: 28 giugno 2017 20.12.17 CEST
Oggetto: RE: RE: RE: different spamassassin behaviours
Right off the bat, the following should be set like below:

$sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;

Setting it as such will add spam info headers to all email not just ones that 
score 2 or above. After you set this setting, do a test email normally and 
paste the headers generated and then run the same email manually and paste the 
headers. I would love to see the difference between the two to see what drives 
up the scores and what doesn't.


The following settings seem really high to me

$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0;  # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 10.0;  # triggers spam evasive actions (e.g. blocks mail)
$sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10;   # spam level beyond which a DSN is not sent

You may want to add these settings:

$sa_spam_modifies_subj = 1;
$sa_spam_subject_tag = '[SPAM]';


Also I suggest you completely turn off auto learn in your SA until you get this 
figured out. As a matter of fact, I never turn it on because it has caused 
MAJOR issues for me in the past where the bayes database gets really screwy and 
things don't get tagged correctly. Up to you.

#bayes
bayes_path /path/to/your/bayes/database
bayes_file_mode 0777
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 0




----------------
Dino Edwards
----------------
[hermes_logo3]
Hermes Secure Email Gateway
Hermes Secure Email Gateway is a Free Open Source (Hermes SEG Community Only) 
Email Gateway that provides Spam, Virus and Malware protection, full in-transit 
and at-rest email encryption as well as email archiving. Hermes Secure Email 
Gateway combines Open Source technologies such as Postfix, Apache SpamAssassin, 
ClamAV, Amavisd-new and CipherMail under one unified web based Web GUI for easy 
administration and management of your incoming and ougoing email for your 
organization. It can be deployed to protect your in-house email solution as 
well as cloud email solutions such as Google Mail and Microsoft Office 365.

Learn More & Download the free open-source appliance at:
https://www.deeztek.com/hermes-secure-email-gateway/

From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:24 AM
To: Dino Edwards <dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>; amavis-users@amavis.org
Subject: RE: RE: different spamassassin behaviours

Here it is, thanks!

Gabriele
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com<http://www.sonicle.com/>
Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com<http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon

________________________________


Da: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>
A: Gabriele Bulfon 
<gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com<mailto:gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com>> 
amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Data: 27 giugno 2017 15.37.22 CEST
Oggetto: RE: RE: different spamassassin behaviours
the x-spam-status headers should always be present Spam or not. So what you are 
saying is that the x-spam-status headers are not present when email goes 
through normally or when they are run manually?
Can you paste your amavis config here?
From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gabriele.bul...@sonicle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:03 AM
To: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>; 
amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM]RE: different spamassassin behaviours
The x-spam-status headers on that cases are not present, because the score is 
too low, and is considered non-spam.
Is there any way I can force the injection of the x-spam-status header even for 
low scores? This may help.

I meant that all the cf files (the rules files) are taken from the same place 
by spamassassin, both manually and automatically during postfix injection, as I 
can see it from the spam taken.

And finally, yes, I can find the logs you say, where the mail (that manually 
scores 18.0+) passes as "CLEAN" in amavis and back into postfix.

I attach an example email, and here is the relative log while passing in:

Jun 27 14:30:15 cloudserver amavis[28190]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] (28190-16) 
Passed CLEAN, [107.175.149.43] [107.175.149.43] 
<vivint.premier-provi...@tmess.us<mailto:vivint.premier-provi...@tmess.us>> -> 
<davide.dicos...@eurovetrocap.com<mailto:davide.dicos...@eurovetrocap.com>>, 
Message-ID: 
<037996f410ef6dcfefa9bbb8b98e2681.3964721.19453093@tmess.us_ys9<mailto:037996f410ef6dcfefa9bbb8b98e2681.3964721.19453093@tmess.us_ys9>>,
 mail_id: tW7q84X98Ieq, Hits: -0.347, size: 5698, queued_as: 9C78D27B16D, 1781 
ms
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com<http://www.sonicle.com/>
Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com<http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/>
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Da: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>
A: amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Data: 27 giugno 2017 13.59.37 CEST
Oggetto: RE: different spamassassin behaviours
Can you provide the x-spam-status headers for the same email when run through 
Postfix normally and then manually so we can see the differences?


Also, I'm a little confused, what do you mean when you say " All the files are 
taken from /sonicle/etc/mail/spamassassin and /sonicle/share/spamassassin"?

Also, in your mail log, do you say a lines similar to below? The first one is 
Amavis passing the message as CLEAN and then re-injecting it back to Postfix on 
port 10025 for delivery. Your port config may vary.

Jun 27 07:55:32 smtp amavis[22662]: (22662-15) Passed CLEAN 
[198.241.162.22]:12141 [198.241.162.22] 
<nore...@visaprepaidprocessing.com<mailto:nore...@visaprepaidprocessing.com>> 
-> <someone@domaintld>, Queue-ID: D19FC40B0A, Message-ID: 
<d5360d$6ue...@cportal1.visa.com<mailto:d5360d$6ue...@cportal1.visa.com>>, 
mail_id: X1sVYvfQoUFh, Hits: -0.877, size: 2490, queued_as: 250 2.6.0 Message 
received, dkim_sd=cportal:visaprepaidprocessing.com, 1280 ms


Jun 27 07:55:32 smtp postfix/smtp[22949]: D19FC40B0A: 
to=<some...@domain.tld<mailto:some...@domain.tld>>, 
relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10021, delay=2.6, delays=1.3/0/0/1.3, dsn=2.6.0, 
status=sent (250 2.6.0 from MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.6.0 Message 
received)




From: Gabriele Bulfon [mailto:gbul...@sonicle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 2:35 AM
To: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>; 
amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Subject: RE: different spamassassin behaviours

Hi, thanks for your response.

There are a lot of things rising the score manually:

X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=18.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,CUSTOM_MANY_BL,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_DNSBL_INPS_DE,
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2,
RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3,RCVD_IN_WPBL,SPF_HELO_PASS,TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET,
T_REMOTE_IMAGE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL,URIBL_DBL_SPAM
autolearn=spam autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1

All the files are taken from /sonicle/etc/mail/spamassassin and 
/sonicle/share/spamassassin, and they looks to be read both manually and during 
postfix run, as many of the mails are caught and contains X-Spam-Status with 
tags taken from there (sare cf files, kam file, fili_br file etc).
Also, many of the auto-learnt mails get spammed after being trained.
The bayes is configured as :

use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_path /sonicle/var/spamassassin/bayes_db/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777

and here are the files:

sonicle@www:~$ ls -l /sonicle/var/spamassassin/bayes_db
total 12699
-rw-rw-rw- 1 snclamav snclamav 25680 Jun 27 08:28 bayes_journal
-rw-rw-rw- 1 snclamav snclamav 10567680 Jun 27 07:58 bayes_seen
-rw-rw-rw- 1 snclamav snclamav 5128192 Jun 27 07:58 bayes_toks

here are the amavis processes:

sonicle@www:~$ ps -ef | grep amavisd
snclamav 23517 20393 0 07:43:58 ? 0:04 /sonicle/bin/perl -T 
/sonicle/sbin/amavisd -u snclamav -c /sonicle/etc/amavis/a...
snclamav 20393 6278 0 May 12 ? 0:49 /sonicle/bin/perl -T /sonicle/sbin/amavisd 
-u snclamav -c /sonicle/etc/amavis/a...
snclamav 29614 20393 0 08:28:49 ? 0:00 /sonicle/bin/perl -T 
/sonicle/sbin/amavisd -u snclamav -c /sonicle/etc/amavis/a...

is there any way I can run amavisd manually exactly as postfix would do during 
an incoming email?
I bet I need debugging output, but enabling it live may fill my mail logs, and 
I would have to wait for some spam to get in.

Thanks again,
Gabriele




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com
Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon

________________________________________


Da: Dino Edwards 
<dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net<mailto:dino.edwa...@mydirectmail.net>>
A: amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Data: 26 giugno 2017 19.08.11 CEST
Oggetto: RE: different spamassassin behaviours

Do you know for a fact that the bayes database is making those scores get 
higher when you run it in debug? If so, where is your bayes database stored and 
who is the owner of that path? Do you know for a fact that Amavis calls 
Spamassassin to scan emails?





----------------

Hermes Secure Email Gateway
Hermes Secure Email Gateway is a Free Open Source (Hermes SEG Community Only) 
Email Gateway that provides Spam, Virus and Malware protection, full in-transit 
and at-rest email encryption as well as email archiving. Hermes Secure Email 
Gateway combines Open Source technologies such as Postfix, Apache SpamAssassin, 
ClamAV, Amavisd-new and CipherMail under one unified web based Web GUI for easy 
administration and management of your incoming and ougoing email for your 
organization. It can be deployed to protect your in-house email solution as 
well as cloud email solutions such as Google Mail and Microsoft Office 365.

Learn More & Download the free open-source appliance at:
https://www.deeztek.com/hermes-secure-email-gateway/

From: amavis-users 
[mailto:amavis-users-bounces+dino.edwards=mydirectmail....@amavis.org] On 
Behalf Of Gabriele Bulfon
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 11:57 AM
To: amavis-users@amavis.org<mailto:amavis-users@amavis.org>
Subject: different spamassassin behaviours

Hi,

I have some installation of amavis+postfix, where I discovered that some spam 
is coming in with a very low score, but if I run spamassassin in debug mode on 
the same emails they get a very high score.

On my installations, amavisd runs under the "snclamav" user, while the 
smtp-amavis postfix daemons run under the "snclmail" user.
I run the bayes learn using the snclamav user, and also run spamassassin debug 
mode using the same user, that stores the bayes database in a specific path.

Any idea what may happen in amavisd spawn spamassassin that does not happen in 
manual debug mode?

Thanks for any help

Gabriele
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com
Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon


<<image002.jpg@01D2EE7D.41BA0B40<mailto:image002.jpg@01D2EE7D.41BA0B40>>>


<<image002.jpg@01D2F018.8BACE190>>

Young student dreams about sex with two men.
Ready to go to any city and country for quality sex.

My profile is here, i'm 
waiting.<http://ax000.alienearmusic.com/extend.php?utm_source=1grdazu&utm_medium=z0h16yw&utm_campaign=pmwh4hp&utm_term=ar3ixvp&utm_content=62fztz87vj>


Reply via email to