You can set $sa_tag_level_deflt (different from $sa_tag2_level_deflt) to
lower level - mails with scores above $sa_tag_level_deflt will have spam
info header added; this header shows how amavis has calculated the score.

On 19 July 2017 at 14:02, Scappatura Rocco <rocco.scappat...@infracom.it>
wrote:

> Thank you for the answer.
>
>
>
> Yes, you are right. Anyway I set ‘$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31’ too in
> amavis configuration.
>
>
>
> I could agree for the differnce of the score of the message assigned by
> amavis and the score of the SA test of the quarantined message..
>
>
>
> But, I would like to understand why amavis assigns a so high score (7.946)
> to a harmless message ..
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> RS
>
>
>
>
>
> *Da:* amavis-users [mailto:amavis-users-bounces+rocco.scappatura=
> infracom...@amavis.org] *Per conto di *Dominic Raferd
> *Inviato:* mercoledì 19 luglio 2017 14:28
> *A:* amavis-users@amavis.org
> *Oggetto:* Re: R: R: R: R: Message quarantined as SPAM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 19 July 2017 at 12:56, Scappatura Rocco <rocco.scappat...@infracom.it>
> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Even after the changes done to the amavis configuration, I still notice
> that some messages has been blocked as SPAM. For example:
>
> Jul 18 12:04:55 zzz amavis[18242]: (18242-14) Blocked SPAM
> {DiscardedInbound,Quarantined}, [195.245.231.137]:39849 [193.67.127.189] <
> orderfl...@example.org> -> <iagro...@example.net>, quarantine:
> B/spam-BknEtFAN2Yh1.gz, Queue-ID: 31099D5C4B, Message-ID: <
> of2b08da46.86f90238-on80258161.00376...@leaseplancorp.net>, mail_id:
> BknEtFAN2Yh1, Hits: 7.946, size: 170434, 551 ms
>
> while the score I get while testing the messages is much lower that
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt (1.9 < 6.31):
>
> ​...
>
>
>
> Where is the problem? Why the message is tagged as SPAM and quarantined?
>
>
>
> ​It is not $sa_tag2_level_deflt that determines whether message is
> quarantined, this only determines whether to add 'spam detected' headers in
> the emails.
>
>
>
> Score above $sa_kill_level_deflt​ triggers evasive action (i.e. according
> to $spam_quarantine_method).
>
>
>
> Also I am not sure you can rely on getting same spam calculation when you
> re-test a quarantined email as when it arrives from outside, perhaps this
> is why header shows score of 7.946 but retest only 1.9?
>

Reply via email to