Hi Vikram, Thanks for the JSON information. For tagging, it is recommended to do ambari-0.9.0-rc0, then rename it to ambari-0.9.0 when vote has passed. It is safer than remembering revision number in email thread.
regards, Eric On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Vikram Dixit <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > With regard to JSON, I see this > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#json > > Please let me know if anything needs to be done. > > I will generate a tag as well when I create the new release candidate. > > Thanks > Vikram. > > On Jul 12, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > >> Hi Hitesh, >> >> Two issues: >> >> There is no tag for the voting rc. >> You can not include JSON.org json library. The license term "The >> Software shall be used for Good, not Evil." The license is too good >> for Apache. >> >> regards, >> Eric >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Patch uploaded and committed to trunk for AMBARI-632. >>> >>> thanks >>> -- Hitesh >>> >>> On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote: >>> >>>> I think the following should go into 0.9: >>>> >>>> AMBARI-607 - increase timeouts to avoid single node install failures >>>> AMBARI-598 - fix incorrect matches in orchestrator >>>> AMBARI-624 - fix pkg installs for various components - broken by move to >>>> all 64-bit for DN/TTs >>>> AMBARI-630 - lzo installs are broken today as they do not install required >>>> native libs >>>> AMBARI-632 - sqoop broken due to missing mysql connector jar ( should have >>>> a patch shortly ) >>>> >>>> -- Hitesh >>>> >>>> On Jul 12, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Vikram Dixit wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>> >>>>> I have pushed AMBARI-627 to branch 0.9. Please let me know if there are >>>>> more issues that are either blockers or you think should be a part of >>>>> branch 0.9. I will publish a new release candidate in a few hours. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Vikram. >>>> >>> >
