heheheh, it sounds you're looking forward to a JPA-based storage implementation ;) :P jokes a part, I don't think that in therms of entities representation it is good relating things in that way, I just need more time to think about it. Thanks! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote: > A token is tightly bound to a Consumer key. > > Therefore we could include an additional field in the Token, > representing the consumer key - which would simplify operations in a > number of different places. > > Objections? > > > p > >
