It's released under Apache License Version 2.0 Cheers, Lukasz
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Henry Saputra <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Łukasz, > > I couldnt find the licensing information about leelo from the website. > > What kind of license leelo support for usage? > > Thanks, > > Henry > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Łukasz Moreń <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Thank you for your preliminary approval, it sounds great! I think the > OAuth > > implementation will benefit from being included under Apache umbrella. > > > > I know at least few people that are using OAuth leeloo already and some > that > > plan to use it in the near future. > > We would like to move our code to Apache repositories as soon as possible > > and continue development there, before (hopefully) more people start > using > > it. > > We are currently busy with other work as well but we will try our best to > do > > it smoothly (and pretty soon). > > > > Before we move OAuth leeloo to Amber, I have few concerns: > > > > 1) What is the procedure at ASF for moving code into an Apache > repository? I > > think we should get a committer access to AMBER? > > 2) We hope to keep the library name (leeloo) and package names as people > > blogged about it, mentioned in tweets, dzone, etc? > > > > I'll be looking forward to your reply. Please let me know if you have any > > questions or would like to adivse us about the process (licensing terms, > > etc.). > > > > Cheers, > > Lukasz Moren > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Henry >
