Hi *,

On May 10, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:

> Hi, Pid.
> 
> Thank you for resuming the checkpoints. Please see my comments inline.
> 
> Raymond
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 1:05 PM, Pid wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> There's been a bit of a gap since Antonio's last thread/summary.
>> 
>> Can we have a checkpoint now & see what's changed, if anything?
>> 
>> I know there's been some discussion with legal@ and I'd happily
>> volunteer to discuss the copyright issue with Newcastle Uni, if the
>> project felt that this would help move things forwards.
>> 
>> 
> 
> If you can help resolve the issue with Newcastle Univ. and have them sign off 
> the copyright (they can just agree to either remove it or move them into the 
> NOTICE file from the headers). This is the only concern left. 


+1

> 
>> 
>> 
>> If not, then it seems like the following are our options - unless I've
>> missed a thread & am out of date*:
>> 
>> 1.  We proceed with a release (Incubator permits releases even if all
>> exit criteria are not met)
> 
> Based on the comments on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134, I 
> think we are good to move forward.

+1 . So how about a first release? See also [0]?

Regards

Antonio

[0] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBER/Amber+next+release+plan

> 
>> 
>> 2.  We tag the existing trunk & mark it DORMANT; starting a fresh API
>> (ie abstract/interface only) for discussion - attempting a cleaner
>> implementation thereafter
> 
> I prefer option 1.
> 
>> 
>> 3.  We send Amber to the Attic
>> 
> 
> -1 :-).
> 
>> 
>> Question: Are there any other options?
>> 
>> 
>> p
>> 
>> 
>> * Happy to be corrected, of course!
>> 
>> Note: IANAL but I think that #2 might be tricky legally, without finding
>> new committers who are not tainted by having read our code; copyright in
>> software is reasonably well established in this regard AFAIK.
>> 
>> #2 effectively implies that our tenure of the project is a transitional
>> one, as we'd effectively be handing it over to people who can write code
>> for the project.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> [key:62590808]
>> 
> 

Reply via email to