I saw the news. It's great. Are there any known gaps in Amber to support the final spec?
Thanks, Raymond On Oct 15, 2012, at 2:31 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > FYI > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Mike Jones > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: October 13, 2012 1:34:01 AM GMT+02:00 > To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 RFCs Completed > > The OAuth 2.0 Core and Bearer specifications are now RFC > 6749<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.txt> and RFC > 6750<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6750.txt>. Thanks to all of you who > brought us to this important milestone! > > I wrote about this at http://self-issued.info/?p=870 and Dick wrote about it > athttp://dickhardt.org/2012/10/oauth-2-0/. > > Now, on to approving the next set of related standards! > > Thanks all! > -- Mike > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
