Hi Antonio, There already are builders in the current amber project. I think we could have a look at enhancing the current error builder. I don't know whether I will have time for that before my holiday otherwise I will have a look at it when I'm back (I will be back around the 19th of november)
By the way what is the target of Amber? Is it meant to only provide the basic building blocks to build an OAuth Authorization server, Resource Server and client? or are there plans to do more than that? (e.g. implement a standard OAuth controller which is capable of doing these things. Regards, Stein On 18 okt. 2012, at 17:17, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stein, > > would you think this builder would suit the Amber code base as well? > If yes any contributions is appreciated :) > > Regards > > Antonio > > On Oct 18, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Stein Welberg wrote: > >> Thanks for the quick reply Antonio. >> >> We actually could take it a step further by presenting a builder that builds >> the correct error response based on the OAuthProblemException thrown. It now >> does it to some extend :) >> >> What are your ideas about this? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Regards, >> Stein >> >> On 18 okt. 2012, at 14:40, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Stein >>> >>> On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Stein Welberg wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Guys, >>>> >>>> I recently started working with the Amber Authorization server >>>> implementation. I also have looked at other implementations but Amber >>>> gives me the most flexibility in adding an OAuth authorization server to >>>> our Saas platform. >>>> >>>> However, the current amber implementation gives me some challenges. I run >>>> into the following when it comes to handling OAuth errors. Amber gives me >>>> some handles but it requires me to have a quite extensive understanding of >>>> the OAuth spec in order to get spec compliant messages. Basically Amber >>>> gives me not much help in handling OAuth compliant error messages. >>>> >>>> Are you planning on improving this >>> >>> well, yes if needed :) >>> >>> Thanks a lot for your contributions so far! >>> Let us give a look at your patch.... >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> >>>> or is it intentionally done the way it is done? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Stein Welberg >>>> >>> >> >
