and also they seemed to have copied our logo (making it better :P)...too bad.
Tommaso 2012/12/7 Pid * <[email protected]> > +1 Yup I think so too. > > > On 7 Dec 2012, at 13:30, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think that, provided that we decide to change name, we should choose a > > completely new one to avoid confusion between Leelo and Apache Amber. > > > > +1 for a new name. > > Tommaso > > > > 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> > > > >> > >> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > >> > >>> thanks for bringing this to the table Antonio, if I recall correctly > when > >>> the name change is usually encouraged when there's already at least one > >>> other software with the same name, in this case we're also talking > about > >>> OSS so it may be the case :-( > >> > >> Indeed my main "concerns" about the name Amber comes from this search > >> > >> http://www.ohloh.net/p?page=1&q=amber&ref=homepage&sort=relevance > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Antonio > >> > >> > >>> What do others think? > >>> Tommaso > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/12/7 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> Hi *, > >>>> > >>>> some time ago I have opened PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 [0] in order to > double > >>>> check Apache Amber will be a suitable name. > >>>> > >>>> I am still working on it but at a first glance it looks that this name > >>>> might overlap with some other pre-existing software. > >>>> So we might need to change the final name... :S > >>>> > >>>> WDYT? > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> > >>>> Antonio > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12 > >> > >> >
