Hi Scott
On Dec 8, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: > On 8 Dec 2012, at 10:06, Antonio Sanso wrote: > >> Hi Scott >> >> On Dec 7, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: >> >>> >>> On 7 Dec 2012, at 15:05, Antonio Sanso wrote: >>> >>>> Hi *, >>>> >>>> from the previous discussion it looks enough clear we cannot keep the name >>>> Amber for the potential Apache TLP. >>>> Mainly due an existing software project [0]. >>>> For legal reasons we cannot as well reuse Leeloo as previously explained >>>> (no CLA signed). >>> >>> Still?!? >>> >>> Whats the holdup? >> >> >> no hold up anymore :) Just referring to the fact we cannot use Leeloo as a >> name, as explained from Simone in [0] > > I meant, is there still a requirement for obtaining a CCLA from Newcastle > Uni? Or have the team given up chasing it? see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134 Regards Antonio > >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio >> >> [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e2gkspbwipnqzua6 >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> So we need a new name. >>>> Let's the brainstorm begin :) (?) >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Antonio >>>> >>>> [0] http://amber-lang.net/ >>> >> >
