> Archie Cobbs says: > This is an easy call. The answer is that it's not worth changing > because this would cause legacy to to start failing > ... > and there is already a perfectly reasonable workaround.
I agree. I do think it's worth issuing warnings _by default_, and turning this into _opt-out_ rather than _opt-in_. > I can't think of very many examples in the past. where Java made such > a change (that is, where (a) and (b) were true. > > I guess the treatment of "_" and "yield" count. Just to say that `yield` also does not count. It is a contextual keyword AFAIK. There have been an extremely minimal amount of breaking language changes, as far as I am aware, basically zero of Amber. Best regards, Mahied Maruf <[email protected]>
