Did you happen to calculate what percentage was _not_ the "default"
case? I would expect that to be a considerable fraction.
On 3/9/2018 5:49 PM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Remi Forax <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
When i asked what we should do instead, the answer is either:
1/ we should not allow block of codes in the expression switch
but only expression
2/ that we should use the lambda syntax with return, even if the
semantics is different from the lambda semantics.
I do not like (1) because i think the expression switch will
become useless
In our (large) codebase, +Louis determined that, among switch
statements that appear translatable to expression switch, 13.8% of
them seem to require at least one multi-statement case.
