Hi all,
ASM doesn't like too much weird method names,
exactly the ASMifier, that take a binary class and generate the Java code that
will create the same binary class, doesn't work well with the method named
"\%pattern\%RecordSubType\%(ILjava\|lang\|String\?)".
I have two questions:
- why do we need a description of a pattern inside a record class given that
the Record attribute already provides that description (that is accessible
using Class.getRecordComponents()) ?
A record is already able to describe itself, that's its purpose, why do we
need another way of describing it ?
- why the method that return a PatternHandle is using a mangled name like this ?
Given that the constant dynamic also use the same encoding ??
Rémi
public static java.lang.runtime.PatternHandle
\%pattern\%RecordSubType\%(ILjava\|lang\|String\?)();
descriptor: ()Ljava/lang/runtime/PatternHandle;
flags: (0x0009) ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_STATIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=0, args_size=0
0: ldc #29 // Dynamic
#1:"\\%pattern\\%RecordSubType\\%(ILjava\\|lang\\|String\\?)":Ljava/lang/runtime/PatternHandle;
2: areturn
LineNumberTable:
line 9: 0
