> On 26 Nov 2019, at 19:28, Alex Buckley <alex.buck...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 11/26/2019 8:48 AM, Dan Smith wrote: >> Here's my slightly-tweaked version of this note: >>> It is a limitation of the `class` file that, while a method parameter or a >>> module may be marked `ACC_MANDATED` ([4.7.24], [4.7.25]), there is no >>> equivalent way to flag compiler-generated methods and fields which are not >>> considered implementation artifacts (JLS 13.1). >>> This limitation means that reflective APIs may not accurately indicate the >>> mandated status of such members. > > Thanks. (I note the change from "oversight in the design of" to "limitation > of" :-) ) > > I don't see any changes to > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep359/jep359-20191125/specs/records-jvms.html > ? Should be there now. Thanks, Gavin
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Gavin Bierman
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Maurizio Cimadamore
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Alex Buckley
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Gavin Bierman
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Brian Goetz
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Reco... Maurizio Cimadamore
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Alex Buckley
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Reco... Dan Smith
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (... Alex Buckley
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP ... Gavin Bierman
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP ... Alex Buckley
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Alex Buckley
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Reco... Gavin Bierman
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (... Alex Buckley
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (... Gavin Bierman
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP ... Maurizio Cimadamore
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP ... Tagir Valeev
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Tagir Valeev
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Leonid Kuskov
- Re: Updated Draft specs for JEP 359 (Records) Brian Goetz