On 15/03/2021 13:28, Brian Goetz wrote:
Unchecked conversions are forbidden because of type pollution, that why you can 
not write
   if (o instanceof Foo<Integer> foo) {

Raw type conversions also leads to type pollution, so i think that a type 
pattern with a raw type should be forbidden too.

Note sure I agree here - they are two very different kind of pollutions.

In the Foo<Integer> case the issue is that we might any type that converts to Foo<Integer> to be treated as a Foo<Integer>. E.g. Foo<? extends Number> -> Foo<Integer>. That is unsound, and the unsoundness happens in the conversion itself.

But when you say `o instanceof Foo f`, you are not introducing any pollution. The pollution will be introduced when (and if) the raw type will be accessed.

Honestly, I'm not even sure this deserves a warning (other than the customary "raw-type usage" warning - not an "unchecked" warning, to be clear).

Maurizio

Reply via email to