Good evening,
I'd like to know how we should proceed about reporting bug on a
development branch like drm-next-4.9-si. I've been able to build the
branch without problem and even launch Xorg using its modesetting
driver. However, there are some visual problems I'd like to report
and/or track with people working on bringing GCN 1.0 (and 1.1) to the
amdgpu driver (I'm able to compare the result of using
radeon+modesetting VS amdgpu+modesetting to put aside bugs that could be
related to modesetting itself).
Cheers
Alexandre Demers
On 2016-08-01 17:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Alexandre Demers
<alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
I'd like to know if there is any chance to see a merge / pull request for
the SI code from drm-next-4.8-wip-si into mainline kernel for 4.8? Nothing
seems to have been added to the branch since the end of May. I haven't seen
any thing merged from that branch into drm-next-4.8(-wip) either. What is
its status? Is it considered completed and ready for merge / test / tune up?
As you know, I'm interested in helping on the task. However, I stopped any
work on porting SI to amdgpu when I learned someone at AMD was working on
it. It would have been too long for me to do it in comparison. Now, if I can
be of any help, let me know, my R9 280X is waiting for some tests.
I just pushed an updated branch for 4.9:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-4.9-si
Alex
Cheers,
--
Alexandre Demers
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
